安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
You do realize there's some difference between the numbers "55" and "20"?
Or maybe 1.4 patch is the cause.
Shame...
Not true at all. 30-40 may have been average life expectancy, but that was only because of very high infant mortality. Most of the people who made it past 20 would have lived easily into their 60s.
I went to a graveyard from the 1800s, and that alone was scary. A large percent of the graves were children, dying from random things. It was really quite sad. People who werent children were mostly in the 60s, 70s, and even saw some 80s.
In medieval times, if you had 6 kids, chances are only 3 would make to adult hood. This is why 30 is the average lifespan back then, but that is very misleading when looking at adult life expectancy.
Wut?
Bro go read some books or something. People regularly lived past the 'ripe old age' of 20 in medieval times.