安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
You do realize there's some difference between the numbers "55" and "20"?
Or maybe 1.4 patch is the cause.
Shame...
Not true at all. 30-40 may have been average life expectancy, but that was only because of very high infant mortality. Most of the people who made it past 20 would have lived easily into their 60s.
I went to a graveyard from the 1800s, and that alone was scary. A large percent of the graves were children, dying from random things. It was really quite sad. People who werent children were mostly in the 60s, 70s, and even saw some 80s.
In medieval times, if you had 6 kids, chances are only 3 would make to adult hood. This is why 30 is the average lifespan back then, but that is very misleading when looking at adult life expectancy.
Wut?
Bro go read some books or something. People regularly lived past the 'ripe old age' of 20 in medieval times.