Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
这个链接点不开
You do realize there's some difference between the numbers "55" and "20"?
Or maybe 1.4 patch is the cause.
Shame...
Not true at all. 30-40 may have been average life expectancy, but that was only because of very high infant mortality. Most of the people who made it past 20 would have lived easily into their 60s.
I went to a graveyard from the 1800s, and that alone was scary. A large percent of the graves were children, dying from random things. It was really quite sad. People who werent children were mostly in the 60s, 70s, and even saw some 80s.
In medieval times, if you had 6 kids, chances are only 3 would make to adult hood. This is why 30 is the average lifespan back then, but that is very misleading when looking at adult life expectancy.