Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
past that you could also kinematically defeat one, try to stay low and fast and maneuver to increase the slant range the missile has to travel
as i cant impose a hard limit on missile altitude engagements SAMs can just fire at you whenever, even through mountains, or after the launching unit dies, so there's nothing i can do about that
Well that I can agree upon
radar minimum altitudes are only a suggestion to the AI, and will routinely attack landed planes through line of sight, despite my best efforts
i was simply speaking historically that pK (something that does not exist at all ingame) is not 0 below minimum altitude
You do realize the SA-2s in Vietnam were fairly early variants right? Yeah, ground clutter and multipathing are the main reasons why missiles get min alt floors, and if the occasional late SA-2 does in fact hit me because of just-so-happened-to-be-slightly-more-optimal-environments, yeah I have no qualms with that.
What I do have qualms with, is getting hit, at 5 fuckin' feet. FIVE. Consistently as well, so the reduced Pk when dipping below min alt argument doesn't even work.