Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
past that you could also kinematically defeat one, try to stay low and fast and maneuver to increase the slant range the missile has to travel
as i cant impose a hard limit on missile altitude engagements SAMs can just fire at you whenever, even through mountains, or after the launching unit dies, so there's nothing i can do about that
Well that I can agree upon
radar minimum altitudes are only a suggestion to the AI, and will routinely attack landed planes through line of sight, despite my best efforts
i was simply speaking historically that pK (something that does not exist at all ingame) is not 0 below minimum altitude
You do realize the SA-2s in Vietnam were fairly early variants right? Yeah, ground clutter and multipathing are the main reasons why missiles get min alt floors, and if the occasional late SA-2 does in fact hit me because of just-so-happened-to-be-slightly-more-optimal-environments, yeah I have no qualms with that.
What I do have qualms with, is getting hit, at 5 fuckin' feet. FIVE. Consistently as well, so the reduced Pk when dipping below min alt argument doesn't even work.