安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
past that you could also kinematically defeat one, try to stay low and fast and maneuver to increase the slant range the missile has to travel
as i cant impose a hard limit on missile altitude engagements SAMs can just fire at you whenever, even through mountains, or after the launching unit dies, so there's nothing i can do about that
Well that I can agree upon
radar minimum altitudes are only a suggestion to the AI, and will routinely attack landed planes through line of sight, despite my best efforts
i was simply speaking historically that pK (something that does not exist at all ingame) is not 0 below minimum altitude
You do realize the SA-2s in Vietnam were fairly early variants right? Yeah, ground clutter and multipathing are the main reasons why missiles get min alt floors, and if the occasional late SA-2 does in fact hit me because of just-so-happened-to-be-slightly-more-optimal-environments, yeah I have no qualms with that.
What I do have qualms with, is getting hit, at 5 fuckin' feet. FIVE. Consistently as well, so the reduced Pk when dipping below min alt argument doesn't even work.