Crusader Kings III

Crusader Kings III

200 betyg
Travel Expanded
2
   
Utmärkelse
Favorit
Favoritmarkerad
Avfavoritmarkerad
Filstorlek
Lades upp
Uppdaterades
784.754 KB
27 maj, 2023 @ 12:37
15 mar @ 10:06
7 ändringsnotiser ( visa )

Abonnera för att ladda ner
Travel Expanded

Beskrivning
Updated for 1.15

Adds an additional 22 travel options.

Yes that's it, feel free to suggest more or balance ideas.

- 7 TRAIT related options (forexample trusting can make you go faster)

- 4 BUILDING related options (pack extra food...)

- 5 VARITION of vanilla options (Thugs instead of Mercenaries)

- 6 UNIQUE options (Show your wealth...)

I wanted to add events and other stuff, but it messes to much with compatibility so this will do for now.

But for this, there is no compatibility issues, as it just adds stuff.

GFX etc is done by me, feel free to copy and steal anything you like.
Populära diskussioner Visa alla (2)
1
8 jun @ 11:04
Russian Translation
laxfeed
0
22 apr, 2024 @ 16:12
Traduction Française
Akkihico [.gg/YugenDS]
42 kommentarer
JimmyG1970 8 jul @ 12:25 
I throw a fourth.
Toast 29 maj @ 7:54 
Thirding this :tobdog:
Skep Stealer 19 maj @ 10:47 
Seconding this, I would love this mod to get an update
ZoGer 17 maj @ 15:47 
yep, only 9 seem to be working for me, would love for this to get updated :)
Hamacelos 18 nov, 2024 @ 15:19 
some travel options seem to be hidden with the new update
Gropy  [skapare] 15 okt, 2024 @ 3:37 
What's wrong with the way I do it?
Paradox themselves write

is_shown = {
is_ruler = yes
is_landless_adventurer = yes
}

In their own files, and it should be intented, do you disagree with the option being available for both?
is "is_landed" even an option? I dont see it in the paradox files.
T 15 okt, 2024 @ 3:24 
so there's several travel options (be safe, prepared log., local thugs, etc.) where the conditional for usage is:


is_shown = {
is_ruler = yes
is_landless_adventurer = yes
}


Since there's an implied AND, this means that you have to be both a ruler and a landless adventurer to use them, i.e. a landed ruler can no longer use them.

Is this the intended behavior? Or was that meant to be an explicit OR? And was it meant to be 'is_landed' instead of 'is_ruler'? Because a landless adventurer is already a ruler, so it's double checking in that case. Overall, was the intention something more like?:


is_shown = {
OR = {
is_landed = yes
is_landless_adventurer = yes
}
}
boo.barnes 9 okt, 2024 @ 16:54 
Neat idea, especially the Death March. There have been times when I've wanted to thin out my entourage!
TheRagFromTheCrag 30 sep, 2024 @ 17:45 
Thank god
Gropy  [skapare] 30 sep, 2024 @ 2:07 
Updated to 1.13, no real changes, or additions.