安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Sure, you can, with credit given, use all the Stuff i did.
I dont think so
The Autoresolve should not be an exact Battle Outcome, but show a relatively realistic Outcome overall, especially the Loss of Units on each Sides and this is in Vanilla not possible...
In Vanilla those Kills for Pistoliers and Company Freeman go up to 300 - for each of the Missile Units, while the Swordsmen get only 5-20 Kills each.
Its not about the exact Value, but the overall Outcome of the Battle.
In the above Screenshot Battle i am outnumbering them by far with Knights, double the Missiles, and an additional Garrison Army.
No Way they would ever kill over 800 of my Men alone with their Missile Units,as such a big Army would just overroll them like a Rock.
But yes, this can happen witch so many Kills, but mostly Quarrelers vs Goblins, but even then that every of your Unit has 300 Kills, while the others have nearly nothing, is very uncommon...
Auto resolve does need some love - playing the battles out usually yields drastically different results. I am not sure how the auto resolve can show I am overpowered 5 to 1 but then I play the battle and win a decisive victory. And the in-battle force ratio never seems to match the auto resolve force ratio. Seems to be a quite wonky feature.