安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
by skip-sucking, you are staunching their fun. they are more likely to rate your track poorly.
I am rating this track poorly as you did not stay true to the movie.
https://youtu.be/nUV0O3VqsKs?t=2m47s
Idealy the mapmakers that create these tracks will take some of the criticism they receive and use it to improve. Although I disagree with California that the tracks need to "embrace distance," there is certainly room to grow. One of the best ways to improve these maps, in my opinion, is to have them be around the "standard" map length and to avoid preventing skips. It might not seem like it but a 3 minute track is quite long.
I am not trying to hate on realms maps, if they continue to be of this quality i would actually quite enjoy them as I grew up with acceleracers aswell.