SHENZHEN I/O

SHENZHEN I/O

CROSSOVER
76 条留言
MrSnowman 5 月 1 日 下午 4:32 
Took me a while to recognize that I couldn't simply cross. And then the swap was clear. Good puzzle.
Deployer 2023 年 12 月 17 日 下午 1:26 
Good one indeed! :steamthumbsup:
Verdammte Heinz 2023 年 7 月 2 日 上午 7:45 
Nice puzzle. Found solution 6 / 360 / 6 and after some trial and error the 3 / 0 / 0 one.
Braden 2023 年 5 月 24 日 上午 9:50 
I believe this puzzle showcases a genuine bug in the simulation. The obvious solution is to just wire two DX300s to the inputs and outputs and let them do the work, but this inexplicably doesn't work, and for no reason. The whole point of the DX300 is that it acts like a composite adapter for simple I/O and xbus. Saying that a microcontroller is actually needed to get it to spit out the value when spitting out a value is exactly what it's supposed to always be doing is like saying a human being needs to put their hand on the valve of their faucet in order for water to manifest inside it, and that if they leave the valve open and walk away, water will suddenly and magically stop flowing through the faucet. I've heard of solipsism, but this is ridiculous! (and then the seinfeld theme plays)

Anyways this is either unrealistically contrived or a bug.
greeble 2023 年 5 月 11 日 下午 1:23 
@raisemanface You need to play the main game until you unlock "conceptSPEC" then you can play custom specs from the workshop.
radheshiam16 2023 年 1 月 9 日 下午 12:19 
For humour )) Trys to deal with random on DX300
Almost solved with 4 MC4000X + DX300 (one for input one for output)
MC 4000X all connected to single wire moved between 2 DX300
every has unified code:
```
nop
nop
nop
mov x0 acc
tgt acc 0
+ mov acc x0
+ mov acc x0
+ mov acc x0
slp 1
```
nops - balances input
multiples movs - try to push value to required DX300
it ALMOST working )) - in my case just 5 points of verification was fail. Sad, but challenge to do it not with xors fails )))
raisemanface 2021 年 10 月 23 日 上午 8:52 
How can I use the mod in game? Please help me, thanks!:steamsad:
Unchangeling 2020 年 7 月 24 日 上午 12:04 
(I added a screenshot (tagged as a spoiler) in my screenshots if anyone wants to see it)
Unchangeling 2020 年 7 月 23 日 下午 11:58 
my solution was ¥3, but I confess I didn't actually plan it, I just slapped down three xor gates in a likely configuration, given the limits of the board size , then connected the outputs and looked at what came out on the verification tab (they were reversed at first)
Neekow 2020 年 2 月 16 日 上午 7:26 
For the ¥3 solution: 3 xor gate:
- the first one has inA and inB as input, normal output
- top one, inA and 1st xor output as input, normal output to output B
- top one, inB and 1st xor output as input, normal output to output A
Luna 2019 年 8 月 3 日 上午 9:00 
Found a 6-360-6 solution with 2 MC4000's

MC4000 1:
p0: in a
p1: out b
x0: MC4000 2 x0
code:
mov p0 x0
mov x0 p1
slp 1


MC4000 2:
p0: in b
p1: out a
x0: MC4000 1 x0
code:
mov x0 p1
mov p0 x0
slp 1
naesten 2019 年 3 月 8 日 下午 3:35 
Oops! I was trying for a ¥6 solution and got a ¥3 solution by mistake.
IvanavI 2018 年 10 月 15 日 下午 12:48 
Hmmm, I found a ¥ 7 solution and it was actually rather easy. How people do ¥ 6 solutions eludes me.
IvanavI 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 11:57 
The "gates" solution came to me today at work (the problem just came to my head and I thought: "There has to be some combination where A something (A something B) gives B !", and I quickly scribbled the solution down on in my agenda). Now I wonder how people are solving it with processors , because I can't figure out how to do the wiring .
SPQR 2018 年 10 月 12 日 上午 9:39 
This was great. I solved it with only logic gates. The problem is that I solved it 100% on instinct; I didn't work it out. Something just told me which gates to use and how to connect them. But it can't have been luck as I did it on the first attempt.
Pothawk 2018 年 10 月 6 日 下午 2:05 
i got 6-360-6 with two MC4000's, what are you guys using gates for? x)
zment 2018 年 10 月 4 日 上午 9:57 
This was fun! I solved this without using the logic gates and just used two chips with one shared bidirectional XBUS Time to try to solve with the first solution as well.
Kommisar 2018 年 9 月 24 日 下午 11:38 
Genius puzzle!
Citizen Joe 2018 年 4 月 19 日 上午 8:09 
Bascailly how the solution functions for those who don't quite get it: The XOR gate in the middle is what allows the inputs to swap. Remember an XOR gate requres exactly ONE input or it shuts off. When both inputs A and B are on the middle XOR gate is off, since it has more than one input, meaning the top and bottom recieve one input each. So they switch on, activating both outputs. When only one of the outputs is on, it switches the center XOR on. Combined with the signal from the active input, it switches the XOR on the same side off, and the one on the opposing side on, effectively swapping the output side. When both outputs are off, all the XOR gates shut off as well.
chakatfirepaw 2018 年 4 月 14 日 下午 6:01 
If you want to undersatand it, try writing out the truth tables for the various gates and how they chain together.
andrewb 2018 年 3 月 21 日 下午 4:28 
It's called XOR swap Like I said, I do not understand it at all even though I was able to implement it here.
Overweight_Satan 2018 年 3 月 21 日 下午 4:00 
What algorithm was that?
andrewb 2018 年 3 月 21 日 上午 9:39 
I googled the algorithm which solves this puzzle with no code but I don't get it. Even though I was able to cobble together a solution, I still don't get it. Seriously wtf.
Snooli 2018 年 1 月 3 日 下午 3:15 
After wasting a while figuring this one using a few MC4000 and X-bus, I gave up and went for the actual 3 yen solution.
Solra Bizna 2017 年 12 月 2 日 上午 9:11 
Saw this puzzle out of the corner of my eye, immediately had to try it. Wasn't disappointed.
slow down cadet 2017 年 10 月 9 日 下午 1:58 
Nice. Pulled my hair out. Ugh, I had a ridiculously power-hingry solution with multiple processors, and then realised (as Rathori says) how to do the 0 lines of code solution i.e. only using gates.
大妖怪不知火 2017 年 8 月 23 日 下午 3:36 
very good,it's easy,i use two MC4000,upside one,downside one,and use xBus switch the data
Rathori 2017 年 7 月 1 日 上午 9:59 
It's ironic how being a programmer actually helps solve this with 0 lines of code.
Gabedamien 2017 年 6 月 28 日 下午 11:04 
Beautiful! A+ puzzle with an elegant solution.
Undead 2017 年 6 月 26 日 上午 12:26 
Very well done indeed.
TreZz. (Cuenta EVENTO) 2017 年 5 月 20 日 下午 3:29 
Bien
System1024 2017 年 5 月 19 日 下午 9:46 
a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a.
xtopaz 2017 年 5 月 18 日 下午 3:01 
Great one!
Binderbound 2017 年 2 月 24 日 上午 5:33 
Important note that should be in description: you CAN'T use a bridge accross a gap.
leftbehind 2017 年 2 月 13 日 上午 12:57 
‎¥ 7, Power 600, lines 10


Hmmm... looks like I'll need to use alternate method to get close to what everyone else is getting.
System1024 2017 年 2 月 1 日 上午 11:02 
Great level, i absolutely adore it absolutely despise it
Shadowwolf0357 2017 年 1 月 24 日 下午 7:09 
Good job mate. took me a while to figure it out the a while more to figure out why my solution actually worked.
ZHRMoe 2017 年 1 月 16 日 下午 11:27 
Great job!
Marcello Pistolini 2016 年 12 月 28 日 下午 2:06 
Very great level
Braxus [ES] 2016 年 12 月 27 日 上午 8:24 
I got spoiled by a comment :( Please use the spoiler marks to avoid it.
SanDShrew 2016 年 12 月 12 日 下午 5:31 
csdfsdfsdf
〄Optimus_Prime〄 2016 年 12 月 12 日 上午 11:02 
Gg
Overweight_Satan 2016 年 12 月 12 日 上午 7:11 
I give up. well played sir.
OBET 2016 年 12 月 12 日 上午 6:10 
gg
::::::::::::::::::: 2016 年 12 月 12 日 上午 5:14 
经济界
Y U bully me? 2016 年 12 月 11 日 下午 11:18 
GOOD
z4ddi 2016 年 12 月 11 日 下午 10:05 
nice
-ßЯҢ- CYBER PYRO 2016 年 12 月 11 日 下午 6:22 
Great puzzle! Definitely had me racking my brain around with different solutions. However, I now know how deceptively easy it is. I wonder what the most unnecessarily complex solution for this could be, would it be possible to work in a RAM table or two?
габинус 2016 年 12 月 11 日 下午 3:51 
Норм
Ja Kuba jestem 2016 年 12 月 11 日 上午 10:18 
fajne fajne