安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






This map is smaller version of Otterburg. I don't know if I will be making a summer version of full Otterburg map as at this moment I am working on three maps and I don't know when any of those maps will be finished. So You might get a summer version of this map but definetely not in the near future :)
i hope your planning to make moar of these amazing maps just like this one.
(sorry for the poor spelling)
The glaciers in the river look a little awkward with there jagged edges, can you smooth them out? If not then maybe the map could benefit by adding the cold-weather effect and just letting the whole river freeze over...
There’s too many primary resource nodes (Fuel & Ammo) that destroy the pacing of a battle, It allows players to jump straight into the end-game units which should be a optional choice with resource mods. If you could default it to just two-fuel, two-ammo total for the entire map, the rest are all standard points, This would help to create incentive to prioritize the battle around certain landmarks and make the battle more strategic.