Sid Meier's Civilization V

Sid Meier's Civilization V

Teotihuacan Wonder
20 条留言
Lefondesin 2016 年 1 月 2 日 下午 1:59 
Hi. I've made a Polish translation. I really like the mod and would love if you added it in. I would be really grateful if you could credit me, of course if you agree. Here is the ink to the translation https://www.dropbox.com/s/w74pfs93v4qmz69/Teotihuacan_text_PL_PL.xml?dl=0
Lefondesin
Rootimus 2015 年 1 月 16 日 下午 3:46 
Thank-you
Alyfox 2014 年 10 月 4 日 下午 7:58 
Doesn't this also appear as a city foundable b y the Aztecs? Just like Chichen Itza with the Inca? -_-
Pouakai  [作者] 2013 年 11 月 24 日 上午 9:38 
I think so
Crixartos Artogenos 2013 年 11 月 23 日 下午 7:44 
Is it compatable with BNW?
shautora 2013 年 1 月 3 日 上午 8:25 
I like it. Cool wonder, thanks Pouakai!
Pouakai  [作者] 2012 年 8 月 14 日 下午 9:43 
Yeah, it's coming up soon - I just need to find time to update them.
Adrian-Thorn 2012 年 8 月 14 日 下午 7:25 
Are we ever going to get a Templo Mayor update?
Pouakai  [作者] 2012 年 7 月 5 日 下午 10:45 
Do you have the Gods & Kings expansion pack?
fyrrrsal 2012 年 7 月 5 日 下午 2:35 
Can u send me version 3 of this wonder. Playing a game and updated to version 4 and now game freezes. thanks. fyrrrsal@yahoo.com
Gibble96 2012 年 6 月 28 日 下午 4:24 
I don't have Gods and Kings, but that's probably fine. I'd say 4 base happiness and and 1 great engineer point to keep Teotihuacan in line with Chitchen Itza, though it's not that important to be honest.

I wouldn't have any problems myself playing with this wonder in-game as it currently is.
Pouakai  [作者] 2012 年 6 月 28 日 上午 1:01 
Okay guys, so I've updated it for G&K. It now provides +3 Culture and +1 production from the Stone and Marble, and 5 Happiness. It no longer provides a Golden Age. Thoughts?
Gibble96 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 4:37 
This is a bit random, but I suppose you could drop the great engineer points to 1 since nothing gives more than 1 great person point until tier 2 of medieval age. Not really that important though.
Gibble96 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 4:35 
I concur with yrrebnot. That seems pretty good. The result would be:

4 happiness
3 culture
2 GE points
and +3 culture/+1 production from marble and stone.

All for 300 production/engineering, which IMO would be fine. It has potential to be tweaked if you get a location with 2-3 marble/stone, but such situationally high-rewards are what make this wonder exciting :)
Tonberry 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 3:56 
seems fair to me but im only one person if anyone else has some feedback it might help
Pouakai  [作者] 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 3:47 
So how about No golden Age, but instead have +3 Culture and +1 Production from Marble and Stone?
Tonberry 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 3:35 
for sure perhaps with a little more tweaking afterwards how about increasing the stone/marble bonus to include production as well?
Pouakai  [作者] 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 2:52 
Okay, so would removing the Golden Age make Teotihuacan more balanced?
Gibble96 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 2:50 
I agree with yrrebnot. This wonder is a straight upgrade over Taj Mahal at an earlier point in the game and only 300 production. It's also just rediculously powerful compared to similar tech level wonders. I like the concept, and I'd love to play with it like most of your wonders, but this one is just too overpowered to add to the game while minding fair competition.

I would suggest cutting the static culture bonus and great engineer points to 1 each, and remove the happiness bonus.

OR

I would suggest cutting off the golden age. 300 production for a pile of useful stats and a situational culture bonus would be fair I think. Still tweaked probably, but it would be enough to make it feel somewhat in line with other entry-level medieval wonders.
Tonberry 2012 年 6 月 16 日 下午 2:15 
this needs a drawback i cant think of any off the top of my head maybe a - to food production? but seeing as this is taj mahal + more its too powerful