安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Conquistador replacing horseman does make mechanical sense. It doesn't make historical sense, for whatever that's worth.
Tercio is trash for a unique, and having two units instead of a building or improvement hurts a lot. Replacing it outright with a building or improvement is probably best. I've switched out units for buildings with several of my own mods because buildings are more useful.
My contention is that her UU's are weak. My plan for the Conquistador is to move it over to a Horseman replacement instead of a Knight replacement, which makes sense given expansion is an early-game goal. As for her Tercio, I've not decided yet. Early thoughts are to either let the BonusVsMounted carry over to upgrades, or to move the unit down to a Pikeman replacement and give it a totally different bonus (Flanking, 1 Extra Movement, etc).