Command: Modern Air / Naval Operations WOTY

Command: Modern Air / Naval Operations WOTY

Little Green Men in the Baltic Sea
11 条留言
Shamansky 2018 年 8 月 1 日 上午 11:23 
No updates since :(
i got opps in falkreath 2017 年 10 月 26 日 上午 4:55 
o kurwa ruscy atakuja!!!!!!!!
Shamansky 2016 年 12 月 6 日 上午 11:36 
@lesnyborsuk
Upon scenario launch I am receiving this warning message:
WARNING! Area validation for Exclusion Zone 'Zone 1' belonging to side Poland has FAILED! (...) This will cause problems for the AI navigator. Please check shapre of the area (...) Contact the scenario designer to have the problem rectified.
dramaqueen  [作者] 2016 年 3 月 29 日 下午 12:12 
Guys, thanks for your feedback!
When I have some free time, I would prepare some small update.

@Skjold
If I remember correctly, I chose those postures to Civillians and BAP, because other were making them to share their FOW with you. I think the great part of fun is not actually being able to see Russian bombers until they are over the Baltic Sea. But I will check that again.

Congrats to your score - I have played this a week ago, and shame to admit ;), but I have lost my 4 ships including Jason Dunham. I was so focused on attacking Baltic Fleet, that I totally forgot about Russian Bombers :D.

@Apolyn
Thanks for your input, I have no military background, so this is always helpful. I would try to include this in next update.

Skjold 2016 年 3 月 29 日 上午 7:57 
Good scenario, some feedback.

Make Poland neutral to civilians instead of friendly to make them appear green on the map, and make Baltic Air Policing ally to make them appear blue, im guessing this is a mistake.
I know you said to play with unlimited munitions on, but for future reference its nice to have actual stocks of weapons.

Great work otherwise!

I finished with an "average" score but without using unlimited weapons so had very limited resources :)
Apoloyn 2016 年 3 月 27 日 上午 9:51 
There's a few details here I thought I'd bring up:

You shouldn't be referring to indiviudal squadrons by names like: "480th Fighter Squadron", you should be referring to them by their Squadron nicknames. So in the case I just mentioned, each fighter in the aforementioned squadron should be titled "Warhawk #1, Warhawk #2...", since 'Warhawk' is the nickname of said squadron. Russian fighter squadrons are denoted much differently. Tanker and transport squadrons generally have no nicknames so you'd just use acronomys instead: 180th ARS (Air Refuelling Squadron)

I don't know if you are aware of this or not, but most (There are still a few that are the exception) USAF F-16 squadrons have been upgraded to the CCIP standard, so there should not be any F-16A Falcons from 1993. You'd have to find whether each falcon squadron used either the 40,42,50 or 52 Block versions and then put that specific model in.
Apoloyn 2016 年 3 月 27 日 上午 9:51 
In Malbork AFB, you put a few Russian MIG-29UB's instead of Polish Fulcrums.
In the Polish Air Force, each squadron has the suffix '.elt' at the end.
So the the '41st Tactical Squadron' in Malbork is referred to as: '41.ELT'

Hope this helps.
dramaqueen  [作者] 2016 年 3 月 23 日 上午 9:24 
Thanks for your comments. It is quite large scenario, so it is best to play it with v1.11, where it is 3-5 times faster.
killjoy 2016 年 3 月 19 日 下午 6:11 
After i finish my Essay i'll give it a good play through. Damn life and it's responsibilites!
wallywoocow 2016 年 2 月 27 日 上午 11:43 
It does look really cool!
Baloogan  [开发者] 2016 年 1 月 24 日 上午 9:31 
Looks really cool!