安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Don't get me wrong, I wholeheartedly applaud what you've done, and it might inspire the devs. It's just a shame that it's as unreliable as it is.
I don't make maps myself for Distance, but I can imagine that making good maps is no walk in the park.
From what I can tell, the detection sphere is below the bottom of the object, or at the very least right at the bottom which makes it very hard to precisely line it up.
On top of that, the detection area seems to change depending on the angle the pad is pointing, putting one on a wall needs a detection area about 10 units (meters?) bigger.
Aside from that, I can still usually manage to complete this track without any crashes, I just make sure I line up as straight as I can on the jump pads and go onto them at full speed, as that's how I've aimed the pads. You do need to manipulate your car in the air a bit though, which isn't the easiest thing to do.