安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Like I said in most of the blurbs about these interchanges: they're based on real-life design speeds, not so much on a direct one-on-one comparison to any particular existing junctions (they're also waaay too symmetrical for that). Even then, the ones with the loops feel pretty tight to me as well :)
@MrFDOTRBLX: yes their sizes are ridiculous, but I'm trying to hold myself to real-life design standards wrt speed, curves, inclination, etc. These are 'realistic' interchanges!
Three-Level Stacked Roundabout
Partially Unrolled Cloverleaf
there you will enjoy building