安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Never said I was "appropriating" history to my needs, I was just saying that it looked good. when I said that maybe the handle was just a bit bumpy, i was not meaning "That was the truth about some swords" and other things I said ETC. but i get what you meant and I see why what I said may have been misleading. Thanks :).
like i said, Good Work. Its just a Game, no one cares what it looks like, as long as it is not a pony.
As for rounded off point blades, yeah I agree there were some, however they were pretty niche and you wouldn't ever see thousands of troops running around with them.
The link you showed is to a blade used in 16th century (not medieval ages,in which Chivalry: MEDIEVAL Warfare, moreover the blade wasn't used in combat and it's length is that of a shortsword, which further approves my point in 1st paragraph.
Never the less, I am disappointed that you disapprove. I hope my items in the future will be more to your taste :) cheers for the feedback man!
Lastly the way the diffuse and spec work along with the blade material makes the blade look really flat. Maybe the diffuse is too light,but when you move with the sword in first person view it looks like the same tone.