安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
The question is, what in-game type these building should have?
low-dencity or high residental, what level? I hope CO will make middle-dencity houses to solve this problem.
About the other buildings:
I agree with this critics: most of my row buildings real prototypes are built in tight rows and look wery poor when spawn alone. But You see, thise are real houses, and I hope if I or other people or CO make enough buildings of that kind they will look smooth.
This house is not a real one - it has sraped textures (I made them from different photos I made in 3 different cities - S-Petersburg, Moscow and Prague) and it shows my vision of S-Petersburg (or Moscow or Krakow or may be other old city - see S-Petersburg on Google maps, You will get what I mean) (in)famous well-yards. It is strange, but Russian and some other public don't like this building jut for the reasons Yopposite to Yours (poor textures, strange look when stay alone, doesn't fit vanilla buildings).
+ Nice textures on all sides
+ Fits in well with normal buildings
+ Looks good even when not in a row
I felt some of the others didn't work so well when not in a row, and also that they struggled to fit in with most other buildings in the game. This latest building seems to solve all these problems.