ASUS TUF F17 (2022)
i7 12700H
RTX 3060 6GB
32GB DDR5 (2x16GB)
NVMe Gen 4 (RAID 0)
Win 11


Game Version: 2.20.152984
mimalloc_v219_20250213
Resolution: 1920*1080
Preset: Ultra
Vsync: OFF

Low: 51
High: 118
Average 71

Game Version: 2.20
3440*1440
View Distance: 3800
Object Distance: 2200
All Ultra, FSAAx2

Low: 66
High: Vsync (120)
Average 77.8

i7 12700k stock
4070 Super 12GB (slight factory OC)
32GB DDR4 3600MHz XMP
NVMe Gen 4
Win 11 LTSC IoT 24H2

1440p
9800X3D
4070super

ultra setting
view distance:7000m
object distance:3538m

FPS: 106.6

1440p
9800x3D
rtx 4070

Standard Settings with mimalloc.
Average 193.3
Minimum 140

(Settings in Screenshot)
https://i.postimg.cc/Zq2S4sp0/grafik.png

1440P
9800X3D
rtx 4070

Standard settings
191.3 FPS , mimalloc , profiling branch , Load page enabled ,
214 FPS With Shadows Disabled standard settings

In the dev branch, changelog says: Added: Replaced Real Virtuality multithreading system with Enfusion's version.
https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/140837-development-branch-changelog/?page=62&tab=comments#comment-3535941

Can any one test the dev branch with YAAB, if it really work well?

Pefo Branch
CPU- 5800x3d CO-30 PBO +200
GPU - 3070 1900Mhz UV
RAM 32GB DDr4 Quad channel 4 sticks tunnned to Max 3800MHz CL18
3440*1440
Standard settings
HT enabled, Memory Allocator CMA_x64, Large page support enabled
game set to run as Admin
102.1
Also tried all the other memory allocators, Mimalloc_v217 came closest with 100 fps

Main Branch - 2.18.152405
Performance Branch - 2.18.152550 (PhysX Multi-thread update)
Dev Branch - 2.18.152501 (PhysX Multi-thread update)

CPU: i9-14900K (Latest Bios with fixes & Auto everything)
GPU: GTX 1080Ti 11GB
RAM: 64GB DDR5 @ 6400 MHz - 2 slots

Desktop and Game 1080p 120hz on 4K 165hz (120hz limited) monitor


Options Preset - Branch: FPS

Extreme - Main Branch: 47.9
Extreme - Performance Branch: 54.1
Extreme - Dev Branch: 54

Extreme w/ YAAB Standard - Main Branch: 95.7
Extreme w/ YAAB Standard - Performance Branch: 103.4

Standard - Main Branch: 114.3
Standard - Performance Branch: 120.7

On Profiling (Performance Branch)

7800X3D
RTX 3070 8GB
32GB DDR5 @ 6000Mhz Corsair Vengeance
2560x1440 GSYNC Dell Monitor

View Distance: 12000m
OBJ View Distance: 5000m
Shadows: 150m

w/ Effects Mods: Blastcore Compiled By Neetch, Improved Grenades, Better Smoke & MIssile Effects

3x Tested
Average Overall: 81 FPS

9800X3D
DDR5 6000 CL30
RTX 4080 Super
4K Standard setting: 138.4FPS
1080p Standard Setting: 154.6FPS
4K 10000m view distance: 79.0FPS

Ryzen 5800x3d 32 GB 3600mhz RTX4070ti
"YAAB Custom Memory Allocator & Large Pages Windows activated battle: CMA64 AVX2 vs. Goldking mimalloc_v217_lock_pages.dll AVX512"
CMA64: 130.0 FPS
Goldking Mimalloc : 135.4 FPS


https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/26556371899265685/9B5140E747A49D3F6229C0E98A337F72C826EC58/?imw=5000&imh=5000&ima=fit&impolicy=Letterbox&imcolor=%23000000&letterbox=false

7800X3D
32GB DDR5 6000
2560X1440 standard settings with mmaloc
153 FPS last weeks months before i had 130

5800x3D @90W PPT (mITX built)
2560x1440 Standard Preset
cma_x64 malloc + Beta Performance branch
130 FPS

Screenshot: https://i.postimg.cc/T34mGfHK/Untitled-1.jpg

Not bad! not bad at all! @Screenfacer

I got 173fps 1080p standard with the new multithread physx profiling branch, haven't tried malloc yet, we're getting close to 200

@ Screenfacer king malloc 2.17 lock pages .dll
right click arma 3 properties then betas then selct perfomance build

google how to set windows to lock pages in memory its pretty easy

set arma 3 video settingd to 1080p standard pre set apply

one the benchmark yaab start his key press S once on key board

make sure no baack ground apps , vsync off fps cap off clean boot it for best fps

I've got 9800X3D, 4090, 64GB DDR5 6000. Willing to run benchmarks. What tweaks/malloc/settings are people using these days?

scroll back i post what settings i used

14900 ks 6.2 ghz x 8 cores ( HT off ) - E cores on @ 4.7 ghz , Ring 5.2 ghz
48 gb ddr5 8,600 mhz cl 36

always 1080p standard settings

" KEY PRESS S ON YOUR KEY BOARD ONCE BENCHMARKS STARTS "

or most of the people for that matter

@Bass Junkie, 1080p and what preset? ive seen so many results from you but never knew which preset you even use

What surprised me the most is that the theoretical single-core performance of the X3D series is not outstanding, but the actual game performance is not inferior to Intel. I am curious if anyone has tested it with u9 285K？

@ grazed not 1440p highest settings....
we run 1080p 1920 x1080 then when the yaab starts key press s

use the latest malloc 2.14
use the lates perofmance build under arma 3 proeprties then beta then perfomance build

make sure windows is lock pages in ram google how to .

once you haave done those 4 steps run key press s opnce it running and send us a
new picture please

post cpu speed / ram speed or tuned timmings s owe all can compare properly

My 4090 + 9800X3D Benchmarks:

https://imgur.com/a/u5rHLC1

9800 3d max tune anyone ?

Can someone post 9800x3d results here?

I think you should also state min FPS, not just medium

remember to state if using key press s default yaab settigns or using all low settings ect ...

13950HX(Q1LP) aka 13900k @P 5.8 DDR-4 fully tunned system
GoldJohnKing memory allocator
mimalloc_v214.dll

169.4 FPS
https://i.imgur.com/GuFzsap.png

There's something I must be doing wrong here...
I'm rocking 14700k with 4080 super & 5600 DDR5
I'm getting +/- 80 FPS.

Using Mimalloc Lock pages...

What else am I missing (I am on 1440p if that changes anything)

@Toby_283 definitely 7800x3d. The performance would be similar. My 7800x3d can get above 135 fps which around what you'll get with 14700 but it does this while staying cooler, using less energy and more importantly, staying stable. Intel 13 and 14th gen CPUs are failing en Masse right now and it looks like a big deal.

hey guys Ill be building myself a new PC (mostly for arma 3) and I need help with the cpu. Im curently deciding between the i7 14700 and the ryzen 7 7800x3d. As I said its mostly for arma and I just cant find any info anywhere alse about the performance in arma. Thx for help.

Mr Gramm what cpu speed and ring cahce speed ?

6.4 - 6.5 ghz ? 5.4 ghz ring clock ?

https://i.ibb.co/P9j5Wrn/Arm-A-3-Screenshot-2024-02-23-01-50-15-53.png

merry christmas all i broke my record im on 2 pcs

Rig 1 DDR5 = 146 FPS

- 14900k @ 6.2 ghz ht off e cores off
- Asus Apec encore bios 0080
- Team group DDR 5 @ 8,400 cl -c36 tuned
- Strix 4090
- Asus pg27aqn 1440p 360 hz ulmb 2

Rig 2 DDR4 = 143 FPS

- 13900 ks @ 6.2 ghz / 52 ring / ht off / e cores off
- Asus Strix wifi d4 bios 1801
- G.skill 32gb dual rank 4,400 c17 @ 4,300 cl 15 Gear 1
- Strix 3080 12gb
- 1080p 240hz aoc

yaab standard settings / malloc used tbbmalloc_202150 / large pages enabled both tests on both rigs

LINKS showing timings and scores and speeds

ddr5 rig score link https://ibb.co/0JWDLBD

ddr4 rig score link https://ibb.co/gPNHDbV

sperg it would be so close you could oc to 5.5 - 5.8 ghz p cores easy maybe less ram speed vs 14900k since imc prob worse but nothing you would notice

@Bass Junkie I'm also quite curious to see what a i5 14600k would do, maybe someone will have the time to test one

@Bass Junkie Damn dude, that;s pretty insane... 14900k seems to be the way to go so far.
But I think I would rather wait for the 16900k

Update on my new Rig had a 13th gen binned 13900 ks SP-120 @ 6.0 ghz and DDR 4 32 GB @ 4,300 CL 15 Gear1 tuned , rtx 4090 tha tscored 130.2 fps average best run this is 2nd pc now

Main Rig
binned 14th gen 14900 k - SP 115 / MC-87
APEX Z-790 ENCORE BIOS 0071
6.0 ghz all P cores @ 1.42V
5.1 ghz Ring cache
4.6 ghz E cores
TEAM Group 48 GB - DDR 5 @ 8,400 mhz c36 tuned - 232,000 trfc
Strix Rtx 4090
gen 4 m.2

Key press S start of test 1080p

149 FPS average

i7-7700k
64GB Ram
RTX 3070
Bloom Off
Motion Blur Off
Very High Settings
YAAB Standard applied

Low 22
High 48
Average 32.6

I have no idea why it's so low. Even on fresh load I get texture popin for a second before it's fine for second/third tests. I tried doing some of those other options mentioned in other comments and I still can't even touch 60 FPS at all even at the start when dumping quality hyper low.
I'm stumped. I think This might be the lowest mark mentioned here

AMD 5800x3D
AsRock X370
MSI 4070
32gb RAM

with AVX2 malloc = 110 FPS WQHD Standard Preset + S key

Anyone has a 14700K to run this on? Debating between that & 7800X3D

84 FPS avg @ 1440p
Standard settings (Pressed S)
5800x3d
rtx 4080
32gb ram @3600mhz
Windows 11

will have my 14900 k to test out i curently have a 13900 ks @ 6.0 ghz p cores / 5.0 ring / 4.5 e cores wit h32gb ddr4 @ 4,300 cl 15 gear 1 .

i will try e cores on vs off
ht on vs off
6.0-6.2 ghz ht off

Running on an AMD Ryzen 7 7700X with an ASRock RX7900XTX Phantom Gaming OC...
The test runs between 50-90fps...
It only uses about 20% on the cpu and 50% on the gfx card...
I guess the game is getting too old for modern pc's...

try a clean windows boot , no discord , no audio app , no chrome back ground , close out all back ground stuff task manager , try a diffrent ram maloc ?

@Bass Junkie Disabling ecores made it even worse. Avg 75, high 126, low 48. Stumped.

e cores try off

1440p. Standard settings. only 91.7 FPS avg, 152 fps high, and 61 fps low. Not sure what's going on here... i9 13900k, no overclock other than turbo 5.8ghz, 7200 MHz CL34 DDR5. I believe CAS latency is 36-40-42-34.

Why is my FPS so horrible compared to every other comment?

1440p more or less same result, this game only works on cpu.

5800x3d -30 curve all cores, 4070 ti, windows 10 64 bit.

1080P standart -s

tbbmalloc_202160.dll ==> 113.5 FPS
mimalloc-v207-no-collect.dll ==> 113 FPS