安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Forts ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ up ships were a very big thing back in the day (of cannons, that is). You wouldn't be able to get close to a fortress with a ship, that's why we have so many of them. But in Civ V they are useless against water, because ships can just zip past them and whatnot
However, I don't suggest making Sea Forts available ingame until the days of gunpowder in Europe. Unless anyone knows of earlier sea forts in countries that had gunpowder before Europe. :)
I saw some people were requesting something that looks like a fortified harbour, maybe the art of the feitoria improvement would do the trick ?
The British version were called the Maunsell Forts and there is a WiKi link for more info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunsell_Forts
They are not like the Airbases often found on small islands and as you can see they do indeed stand in teh water.
So.... for me your mod is a great idea :)
Great General improves only strategic resources (because they can be invisibile when GG is planted), but not luxury resources. You loose a tradable lux resource if you plant a GG on top of it. This mod improve both, lux and str? Purposely/accidentally different than GG or did I misread the information?
@author Great mod :)