安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
Sorry for the confusion caused by the update. I have received feedback and are currently making modifications based on suggestions.
If an item can be stacked, then the "stack cost" field is displayed first (this is for the entire stack, not for the actual number currently in the stack. Perhaps this is a mistake?), and the "cost" field is moved to third place (this field correctly displays the total cost of several items in a stack).
When I select an item and compare it, I see its cost, then (second) the cost per kilogram. Okay, that's convenient. But now there's a cost per stack field. What's the point of this field? It shows the cost for the entire stack, for example, and I currently only have one item from that stack, and I see some large amount (the cost if I had a full stack), and this field is now displayed first, then the cost per kilogram, and then (third) the actual cost. This is very confusing, since I keep looking at the first field out of habit. I hope we can understand each other using multiple translators. )))))
将描述修改成灰色是很棒的建议，我还增加了字体大小以便阅读。
红绿灯或许不是最好的方案，因为游戏中有大量低价值物品，它们只能被显示为红色（坏）。
我希望玩家搜到它们时，比起感到它很糟糕，可能平平无奇会更好。
对于重量显示两次的问题，我做了些修改，现在会覆盖原来的重量显示。
重量随其他属性变色的建议也很有意思，我将其修改为了仅在高重量低价值时才变为红色，应该会更符合直觉。
而关于价值和价重比哪个在前面的问题，我也思考了一段时间，我认为把价值放在前面会更好。
因为我觉得玩家应该更喜欢，搜到高价值的物品时的喜悦感，即使它的价重比可能比不上满背包的“垃圾”（笑）
再次感谢建议。
For me, the traffic light coloring scheme of green (good) / yellow (average) / red (bad) is clearer.
Perhaps displaying the weight twice is redundant information. (The weight is in the description by default, and coloring 20 kg red is obvious information to me anyway.)
When the color changes for all three values, it only confuses. In fact, only the average price is important, for comparison with other products.
Another suggestion is to change the color depending on adjacent parameters, for example, where the average price is the main one, and the weight color depends on it. For example, if the average price is gray, then the weight is red; if the average price is yellow (a good value), then the weight is yellow; if the average price is green (a best value), then the weight is green.
If we remove the weight as a repeating value, then we can color-code the price and average price according to this principle (where the average price is the main one).