安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
(1 part) A bit unbalanced mod, played a couple of games for 1 rink (played in a small collection). 1 of the mods allowed the country to simply collapse in a bad situation, a civil war would start if you were against the rebels declaring independence from themselves. So I literally did nothing, didn't even fight them, I had a weaker fleet at the time because I accidentally crashed it into space creatures, but the Aries literally signed a peace treaty a couple of months later and surrendered, although they could have thrown it at me. Or when I fought the bot, I was just stupid because I defeated the enemy fleet, but then lost the fleet to the enemy station because I didn't calculate the strength. So I just rebuilt the fleet a little bigger than it was before the war, but never used it. It got to the point of absurdity.
Can we get a mod where superior fleets just means yesmen
In my experience (loads of other mods), war will quickly or immediately end with AI empires (especially between a AI fallen and norm AI). So overall, with my AI set to aggressive it seems to reduce the effect of wars with the same frequency of war.
Could you add maybe an edict or policy that lets the user adjust the modifier? That way it's more dynamic and folks can adjust it especially with fleet mods.
Or maybe add some ethic based acceptance modifiers, like militaristic having larger offset and pacifist having higher?
Those would be great, and add a bit more meaning into war. Or at least until we get a demand system in the game.