Sea Power

Sea Power

Pact Enhanced LethaliTy
194 条留言
KirbyMirror2 6 小时以前 
It showed the Late loadout in the same line as Default right before I made that comment
nuclearstonk  [作者] 22 小时以前 
it should definitely be fixed now though
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 8 日 下午 8:12 
uh, how? i havent updated the mod yet?
KirbyMirror2 10 月 8 日 下午 7:24 
The Late loadout is now in the proper place
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 7 日 下午 4:45 
there actually is a late loadout, there's just an accidental duplicate loadouts section higher up in the file than it should be
fixed, will be in the next patch, thank you!
KirbyMirror2 10 月 7 日 下午 4:42 
@nuclearstonk Second Slava in wp_rkr_slava_variants.ini has a nonexistent loadout "Late." There's only Default and Top_Plate in wp_rkr_slava.ini right now.
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 6 日 下午 10:19 
my bad, will fix
安格玛污王 10 月 6 日 下午 10:16 
Great job!
Found one small bug:
Kara_89 Kerch-loadout aft SA-N-3 launcher is not functional.
Delete "Default" from "WeaponSystem2Default".
cent 10 月 6 日 下午 3:21 
None.

Steregushchiy-class
Gremyashchiy-class
Admiral Gorshkov class

are the ships that have Redut
SKIBIDI_RIZZLER123 10 月 6 日 下午 1:45 
what ship in pelt use 9M96?
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 6 日 上午 10:04 
do you have NTU and PELT installed? do you have another mods installed as well?
Murauder 10 月 6 日 上午 6:57 
Why all the names in the encyclopedia show up, for example, "MISSING: usn_bb-iowa89 name or squadron reference" ?
BINOGX 10 月 6 日 上午 1:34 
copy that,thanks
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 5 日 下午 7:01 
@BINOGX the type 033 is not a WWII ship (its a mid 60s diesel electric romeo clone) and the four homing torpedoes i gave it are 70s spec because the representation of the 033 ingame is of its 80s type (given the entire class is ingame)
if you want a 60s version of the ship it would be easy to make, but there is literally zero difference between them other than the inclusion of 4 crappy ASuW torpedoes
BINOGX 10 月 4 日 上午 2:15 
Could you separate the more capable type 033 and the base game ww2 version?
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 4 日 上午 1:53 
yes, they should, will be in the next update
KirbyMirror2 10 月 4 日 上午 1:47 
Will Chinese submarines get "Active Intercept Warning" like all the other subs?
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 1 日 下午 2:00 
oops
bg0504 10 月 1 日 上午 11:59 
I think I found a small mistake. Why is there a SPY-1B radar in the sensor's list of 1990's Slava? lol
nuclearstonk  [作者] 10 月 1 日 上午 6:48 
mod's updated
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 25 日 下午 3:28 
ships that are firing 48N6 that still have the 4R41 "Top Dome" radar can only fire out to 50nmi, despite the missile being capable of longer range
Johnvalosky 9 月 25 日 下午 2:29 
In ur updates can you plz check some of the ranges of the s300/400 on ships like the kirov? it seems that the actual range of them doesn't match the stat card at all
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 25 日 下午 12:45 
expect a patch to drop within 15 minutes of the PLAN update
SKIBIDI_RIZZLER123 9 月 25 日 上午 11:21 
PLAN coming 1st october can we expect PELT update soon after that?
eilpost22 9 月 25 日 上午 10:20 
The mod is on top of the modlist but if I start the mission editor to choose a modded ship there is writen, for exampel, "missing: wp_rkr_frunze_94 name or squadron reference`" and in that way for every modded ship. How can I fix that?
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 21 日 上午 1:19 
thank you guys for 20k subs, sorry there hasnt been an update in a couple months, but trust me when i say i've been working on this every week, and the next update will be huge
i'm just waiting on the devs to add PLAN stuff to the game so i can update the mod, because certain new features require the PLAN assets
anony21 9 月 19 日 下午 5:05 
@nuclearstonk
Thank you for your reply. I just tested PELT without anchorchain, same problem.
I'm going to completely reinstall the game at this point.
Thank you for your help.
bg0504 9 月 19 日 下午 3:54 
@nuclearstonk
Understood. Thanks for such a quick response.
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 19 日 下午 3:43 
@bg0504
shtorm-N is already in the mod (has been since release) but currently no ship uses it because i dont have 1989 versions of kara/kresta II yet

kresta I probably wont receive CIWS until i get confirmation from the devs that they wont add it, since it requires some additional work other than just bolting on CIWS (there's an entire superstructure addition!)
bg0504 9 月 19 日 下午 3:17 
Superb mod.
Are there any plans of adding 4 ciws to the 1989 Kresta's? Also, will the M-11 "Shtorm-N" with improved low-altitude target engagement capabilities be implemented in the future?
Brzoza 9 月 14 日 上午 1:10 
well I understand, I was thinking especially about earlier ships for early cold war scenarios
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 13 日 下午 3:09 
well, the earlier and later units simply do not fit within the balance of the game, so there's no way to separate them (and it would require a huge amount of work from me regardless)
if you dont agree with the balancing you can always make a local copy and change whatever you want, after all
Brzoza 9 月 13 日 下午 2:50 
Like project 613 ships etc.
Brzoza 9 月 13 日 下午 2:50 
From the rest of the mod without changing the balance of the game
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 13 日 下午 2:39 
@Brzoza what does that mean? standalone from what?
Brzoza 9 月 13 日 下午 2:21 
Can we have just the new ships standalone pls?
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 13 日 下午 2:07 
@anony21
i have no clue, this mod doesnt affect the land-based SA-10 and doesn't even include any ground units, so perhaps its an outdated sensor file? i cannot think of any other possibilities, other than you having subscribed (but not enabled) a DLL mod on the workshop
try PELT without anchorchain, and let me know if it continues crashing
anony21 9 月 13 日 上午 10:06 
Hello, I am a long-time user of this mod and I love it.
I constantly get error messages when I start a mission and the game crashes when I exit it. If I use the SA-10 SAM and SA10-TEL site,
I have disabled all mods and validated the game file, and there are no more crashes.
After much trial and error, I think the problem is with this mod, because with only Sea Lifter / Anchor Chain and Pact, I get the error and the crash.

Here is the error message:
ERROR: Material 'Marmoset/Transparent/Cutout/Bumped Specular IBL' with Shader 'Marmoset/Transparent/Cutout/Bumped Specular IBL' doesn't have a texture property '_BumpTex'


Any idea what to do?
Chopper1987 9 月 8 日 下午 7:58 
Okay, understandable, thanks for the feedback!
nuclearstonk  [作者] 9 月 8 日 下午 7:54 
@Chopper1987 probably means that mod isnt compatible with PELT, and since i dont know anything about that mod i can't really help you, i can't be responsible with making every mod on the workshop work with my mods
Chopper1987 9 月 8 日 下午 7:51 
I have New Millennium [Fictional Soviet Navy post-1990] mod added, and when I load it and PELT for some reason it crashes. I checked and it is just when I load both of these mods together, if I deactivate PELT it does not CTD when I try to load any mission or the encyclopedia. Any ideas?
Comrade Christian 8 月 7 日 下午 3:10 
maybe you are just bad
FALCON 8 月 3 日 下午 8:55 
Bad mod
Boris 7 月 28 日 上午 11:33 
Thanks for Azov :steamthumbsup:
nuclearstonk  [作者] 7 月 8 日 下午 12:15 
all the kirovs will eventually be completely remade, but that can come at a future time
IceWalloh 7 月 8 日 下午 12:10 
The Kalinin 1989 is shooting SAMs through the superstructure from the point defense turrets. I've noticed it greatly increases defense from ASMs at close range
nuclearstonk  [作者] 6 月 29 日 下午 11:19 
no plans given that i will never implement sealifter into my mods, meaning no completely new aircraft can be added at the moment, but i certainly want to implement R-27 and R-33 as soon as i can (which is not anytime soon)

as for SAMs, i tweak them every update, and in general hit rates are now closer to how i want them, which doesn't mean much given that many of the later ones can simply throw out an arbitrary number of interceptors
moonjy1120 6 月 29 日 下午 11:01 
Do you have any plans to add long range air-to-air missiles (or capable aircraft) to Soviet naval fighters? Also, the ship's anti-aircraft missile hit rate seems to have decreased since the update, has anything changed?
nuclearstonk  [作者] 6 月 29 日 下午 5:36 
maybe at some point, but not anytime soon
SKIBIDI_RIZZLER123 6 月 29 日 下午 5:20 
Any chance for project 667M? Very intresting submarine…