安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
At some point, I realised that I had left my TU16s loitering over Florida, I was like "Maybe I should move everyone to east side of the enemy fleet. Don't feel like I should be able to be here".
However, you can directly create Air Force or Navy airplane units.
The AI doesn't know how to use carriers, so I didn't add one of the US since it wouldn't use it anyway. The same goes for airbases.
The scenario is set in the 60s, which is why you're still seeing modernized Gearings.
I understand the goal is to make the scenario at least theoretically winnable for the playable side, but in that case, there should at least be some explanation as to why the enemy has forces about 10 times smaller than what they would realistically deploy in such an operation.
The Soviet side is somewhat understandable—we fight with whatever they managed to transport across the ocean.
But the U.S.? It feels like the attack was planned by generals who suddenly lost their sense. No reconnaissance or air cover? (Oh right, there was one Orion.) Not even one aircraft carrier allocated for such an operation? Okay, let's assume the carriers are far away. But Florida is right there, with all its airbases and the U.S. Air Force!
Instead, they attack Cuba with four Gearing-class destroyers from World War II. Facepalm.