安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Callframe at: getOrCreateLocation
function: MagazineArmorExpandedBodyLocations.lua -- file: MagazineArmorExpandedBodyLocations.lua line # 3 | MOD: Magazine Armor Expanded
java.lang.RuntimeException:
at se.krka.kahlua.integration.expose.MethodArguments.assertValid(MethodArguments.java:133)
kinda like the newspaper hat but for magazines and a neck bracing thingy
"Any Vanilla Magazine (there are over 30) +Ductape. Simple."
I agree magazine armor would be difficult to penetrate, a few things need to be taken into account. As humans, our brains put limitations on what our bodies can do. I think our bite force can be 3x more powerful, but would cause damage. As an undead being, these limitations would not exist. That's why you see in media, zombies just ripping people apart with ease. I took this into account when deciding the resistances along with consideration to the parts that would be exposed in between coverage.
I compromised by adding an option to double up on magazine armor. Add more protection at the cost of mobility.