安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
But that is maybe outside this mods concept.. maybe it will be easier to do once RtP release
Or is it impossible because of the game engine?
I know it sounds to OP and it is effectively done in other mods like More interactive subjects and Immersive warfare but I feel it is kind of weird that our vassals who serve as knights don't have with them their own knights to protect them.
A game rule where only players vassals are affected is a good idea... definitely would up the challenge.
Ultimately it can spiral, as it increasingly shows the liege isnt actually in control wich hurts perception of the liege , even loyal vassals with good opinion will get influenced by the legitimacy drop.
Also, I'm working on a new update - allowing the player to choose (via Decision) to withhold/deny levies at any time, but with increased penalties if it happens during war time. If they're withholding/denying levies and their liege goes to war, they'll be given the option to increase/restore their obligations.
If you wanted to keep this from being a free imprisonment reason, you could make a skill check to attempt to prove that it's legally their fault not yours which would probably cost you some money and prestige whether you succeed or fail.
"Lieges will get a title revocation reason on vassals who completely refuse to provide levies."
Thats too OP I think (for a player perspective), a imprisonment reason would be much better
Kinda like a alliance/club of haters