安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






By the way they continued after and bordelaux did have the option to vassalise luthor
I lost my last settlement and still didn't get the dillema
Mabye its not SFO compatible?
“I just want to end the war”, with no consequences?
Context:
I tried to extort my friend — asking for all his money in exchange for peace — and because I sent the peace request myself, the mod interpreted it as a surrender on my part.
I understand there may be technical limitations in how the mod handles peace mechanics, but would it be possible to include an option like:
“I just want to end this war — no consequences”?
This would help differentiate between tactical surrender and simply choosing to stop the war.
One of the things I need to clarify and i haven't edited the mod dilemmas to reflect this, is that folks 1. Need to read but 2. I need to clearly define what will happen during a mutiny.
In multiplayer campaigns, not everyone has the same level of experience, and no one actually enjoys steamrolling their friends who have way less playtime and wiping them out of the campaign.
With this mod, attacking them becomes way more fun — they can put up a fierce fight, and when they eventually lose, they don’t just disappear; they’re forced to join your cause.
On top of that, the absence of this kind of mechanic in the base game actually pushes the community toward a PvE-oriented playstyle — mainly for the reasons mentioned above. There’s no real power dynamic that can emerge, so most campaigns just end up being pure co-op against a weak AI (unless you mod it to be smarter).