安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Is not Ready until at least the Year 2032, Maybe 2035.
My suggestion is to model into this building a small on-prem nuclear reactor and remove most of the pollution. i.e. Keep the type as factory but add consume nuclear fuel and produce nuclear waste to the overall process.
Today, IRL, such a setup takes 700C heat and power from a high temp nuclear source, cracks water to get hydrogen and combines with coke to make fuel. No combustion is involved in the process and the impact on environment is minimized, while grade of fuel is higher than from oil.
Definitely not in line with how Soviets did things at the time, but China has some pilot plants today using high-temp helium-cooled reactors.
@polcorp heard of the problem being an outstanding one some 15 years ago or so; should have gotten worse, judging by wars.
In terms of balance I would increase the cost of building it since it is complex technology.
Also the amount of chemicals for input is far too high. There are mods that add factories that produce chemicals from coal so can definitely combine well with those but the production difference is far too high. Importing such a huge amount of chemicals is also out of the question.
Personally Im lowering it to 20t, it's still not profitable to import the inputs and export the outputs (as it should be) but it's much more manageable.