Space Engineers

Space Engineers

Uranium Synthesizer (10x Refining)
18 条留言
Renic 2022 年 9 月 23 日 下午 1:46 
This mod is not useable, it crashes the game during load. Its broken. Could use an update.
stich83guy 2021 年 12 月 31 日 下午 4:34 
this still works for me but i dont have alot of mods about maybe 30 or 50 of them i think
stich83guy 2021 年 12 月 27 日 下午 7:12 
its been some time but ill be seeing if this works
Niamhi 2016 年 6 月 1 日 上午 8:37 
-in-
all files inside Data folder

-find-
<?xml version="1.0"?>

-change to-
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>


-in-
BluePrints.sbc

-find-
<Result Amount="0.03666" TypeId="Ingot" SubtypeId="Uranium" />

-change to-
<Results>
<Item Amount="0.03666" TypeId="Ingot" SubtypeId="Uranium" />
</Results>

-find-
<Result Amount="0.0109331" TypeId="Ingot" SubtypeId="Uranium" />

-change to-
<Results>
<Item Amount="0.0109331" TypeId="Ingot" SubtypeId="Uranium" />
</Results>


-in-
Data folder

-rename-
add _Uranium_Synthesizer to the end of all 3 files.
-example-
BluePrints_Uranium_Synthesizer.sbc
[CoE] darkrhodes 2015 年 11 月 26 日 下午 8:32 
may need to be updated to DX11 if its broken.
Azami 2015 年 10 月 5 日 下午 1:28 
Doesn't work after recent updates
Rita  [作者] 2014 年 11 月 24 日 下午 11:29 
@schlachter125: Yes, the 10x version is 10 times slower than the 1x version.

@HEWOLF: A positive uranium system would basically just be a large reactor and a uranium synthesizer with the right refining speed setting. For example, the 1x version of the synthesizer in a game with 10x refining speed, would use up 1 large reactor worth of uranium, but produce 10 large reactors worth of uranium. (Net gain of 9 large reactors worth of uranium). If you build a second large reactor, then you'd have power for such ridiculous luxuries such as life support and still make a profit of 8 large reactors worth of uranium.

On my own ship that I did this setup on, I turned the use of the conveyor system off for the synthesizer and just filled the input slot manually. This was more for the sake of seeing what was happening though than any real requirement. (And yes, the synthesizer will take uranium from the output slot and move it to the input slot if the conveyor system is on.)
HEWOLF 2014 年 11 月 15 日 上午 8:28 
do you happen to have a image of what a positive uranium system would look like?
Frosty 2014 年 11 月 6 日 上午 6:53 
@at 'breaking physics' people

the concept of using uranium to make more uranium May be a touch hinky. But we do already have small scale reactors able to create more fuel than they use. As well as other reactors that can transmute unusable waste in to useable fuel(thats right, alchemy is finally here!)

and since the game only has 2 fuel sources(that i know of) solar and uranium, i'd say it's completely reasonable. If anything it's just a naming issue

FACT: Nuclear scientists are wizards
megapro 2014 年 10 月 28 日 上午 8:58 
So did I gwt this right the X10 is actually 10X slower rather than 10X faster to compensate for servers with high refinining speed (and is it the same for X3)?
Rita  [作者] 2014 年 10 月 9 日 下午 6:01 
It is possible to make more uranium than it takes to power the synthesizer. Just use the 1x version on a game where the refining speed is set to 3x or 10x. Then with one large reactor and one synthesizer, you'll have a net gain of uranium, which could then be fed into another reactor, and thus an infinite power source can be achieved. If you use it at the intended refining speed, then no, it won't power a reactor indefinately (at least not the vanilla ones).
darktoes 2014 年 10 月 9 日 上午 7:31 
So could this be used to produce infinite uranium to power a reactor indefinitely?
Asp1re 2014 年 10 月 4 日 上午 10:50 
any chance we can get a different model? i think i will get confused if i go to this thinking it was my 2ndary reactor and it being this.
Asp1re 2014 年 10 月 4 日 上午 10:48 
it kinda breaks physics. altho, since energy is being consumed, its not really breaking physics. altho, i have no idea how much energy this consumes. but i think i can retro fit a business shipment cargo ship's solars to power this. have to see.
Callistemon 2014 年 10 月 3 日 下午 3:00 
Well, since our Uranium ingots vanish in to thin air after being used, with no waste products, it only makes sense that it can also be created out of the same aether. :)
UnseenOni 2014 年 10 月 1 日 下午 8:10 
Thus "I like it".
Rita  [作者] 2014 年 10 月 1 日 下午 5:08 
Your physics is weak. It has been replaced.
UnseenOni 2014 年 10 月 1 日 上午 11:52 
This breaks physics aka equivalent exchange, I like it.