安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
As for feedback: The Warhammer novel Knight-Errant features Bretonnia going on a campaign against the beastmen, and at the third (i think) battle the Duke in charge of the army asks the knights-errant to give their mounts to the more senior knights as a lot of steeds were lost in the previous battles. The knights-errant are then asked to bolster the depleted infantry (peasant) ranks. They do so (very reluctantly) and fight with sword and shield.
I think bretonnia could really use dismounted sword/shield wielding knights-errant unit rather than a unit that is a upgraded foot squire unit in both function and visuals. And as the novels indicate, knights-errants are more likely to be asked to fight on foot than the KotR.
Now I also wonder what Brets will get more in TOW.
Hoping at one point for Giant Snails manned by Peasants.
Stay curious
Secondly, balance reasons. Bretonnia should have weak infantry right? These aren't a weak unit, at least by Bretonnian standards, but at least with the barracks chain that's a very effective use of buildings slots since its unlocking lots of units rather than just one. So the clear offset here is do you want this one specific unit or do you want lots of cheaper units. I liked that a lot more than adding a fifth tier to the barracks or tacking it onto the fourth tier where the squires are trained.
I hope that helps you understand my thinking!