安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






- Usually, "historical" or "historical random" settings guarantee that Rome has a couple serious contenders in Iberia, Africa and/or the Balkans. As the player as Rome, it makes for a much needed additional challenge. When playing another nation, it may or may not be frustrating to see AI Rome struggle in those areas, depending on your expectations.
- The "random" setting is usually more beneficial to smaller nations and allows for new regional powers to emerge, but it's less impactful in the grand scheme of things, and AI Rome has an easier time following its historical path of conquest, as per Virtual Limes.
The only other contender that I potentially see as another possible lucky nation would be Arvernia, where Gaul was loosely confederated under Vercingetorix for a brief period. Though in comparison Arvernia would probably be one of the "unluckiest" on the list, because how short lived and circumstantial their "luck" was. Though similar argument can be made for Armenia's subjugation under Rome and Parthia, Epirus, Massylia, Pontus, etc.
I chose 15 random nations at the beginning of the game, and I checked at least 40 different nations and it appears that every nation except Rome has the Lucky Nation bonus listed in their civil war threshold. I thought at first that all except the ineligible nations had it, but then I checked Maurya and even they have it.
I am using Invictus.