安装 Steam						
					
				
				
									登录
											 | 
						语言
						
																																															繁體中文(繁体中文)
																													日本語(日语)
																													한국어(韩语)
																													ไทย(泰语)
																													български(保加利亚语)
																													Čeština(捷克语)
																													Dansk(丹麦语)
																													Deutsch(德语)
																													English(英语)
																													Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
																													Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
																													Ελληνικά(希腊语)
																													Français(法语)
																													Italiano(意大利语)
																													Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
																													Magyar(匈牙利语)
																													Nederlands(荷兰语)
																													Norsk(挪威语)
																													Polski(波兰语)
																													Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
																													Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
																													Română(罗马尼亚语)
																													Русский(俄语)
																													Suomi(芬兰语)
																													Svenska(瑞典语)
																													Türkçe(土耳其语)
																													Tiếng Việt(越南语)
																													Українська(乌克兰语)
																									报告翻译问题
							
						
 
											 
													







Thank you for this
Steel Plate: ~11x
Constuction Components: 20x
Large Steel Tubes: 12.5x
Motors: 15x
Computers: 2x
Given that plates, tubes and construction components have masses of 20, 25 and 8 kgs, respectively, there needs to be far more materials required to explain all that torque these things are exerting! I like your thinking though :)
@Syslis: I think i might take you up on that offer
@namAehT I definitely like the larger-scale gyroscope, it makes ship design SIGNIFICANTLY less irritating, but I think there's an extra factor of 3 in there.
Since α=T*I and the T is what's being applied to the ship, to maintain the same α we need T to scale appropriately with I.
I'll say the small gyrscope's moment of inertia is just m(r^2) for simplicities sake. For a 3x3, the mass scales by the cube but the radius scales linearly, so we get 27*m*(3*r^2)=27*9*m*(r^2)=243*m*(r^2)
So 243 times. Conveniently, this makes the gyroscope more handy for ships in the 15-30 million kg range as well, since 729 gyroscopes on ships of those size verges on absurd.
I just saw I haven't say : Good Job ^^
PS foUrth Horseman
if so better title would be gyro on steroids
What's the power consumption ??
Sorry for mistake, I'm French.