安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






I'll also drop the small stomachs to 0.8, 0.6, and 0.4, which should make them a lot more inconvenient.
A: allows xenotypes to exceed +5 / -5 metabolism (there's already mods that do this)
and
B: actually give bonus / malus for extreme metabolism levels, basically just extending the vanilla range.
I don't think it unreasonable that a +13 metabolism xenotype could have 15% food need, whereas a -20 metabolism supersoldier might need 10x more food than usual. Normally, the latter would mean eating 24/7 just to not starve, but any gene-artist would be coupling that with aforementioned large stomach genes.
Maybe even add genes to allow MUCH faster eating too?
I come to you with some feedback: after playing with the stomach sizes, I don't think the larger stomach size genes are worth it, whereas the small stomach sizes are quite OP imo. A baseliner with just a small stomach will basically eat just as often, but less - no downsides.
On the other hand, 1.3x stomach size for -3 metabolism is really hard to justify.
If I wanted to make a pawn that only eats once a week (but either eats a lot, or sleeps all the time, or other downsides) there are no options for that. I know it sounds like a lot, but imo the max size stomach should add 10x food capacity than normal.
For those among us who don't like alpha genes