安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






In most of my games, I try to optimize for economy in my settlements, so these trade-offs seem appropriate. In the mid-late game, I envisage the buildings being spammed allowing for more research (which should make sense because you should occupy lots of land and should have a research advantage), the modernization bonuses should be moot (since you should have reached T4 long ago), and the public order more meaningful (because it will determine the rate of your economic upgrades/balancing vs taxes and the like).
So I guess conceptually I see these buildings as competing with economy buildings for slots and funds in the midgame development and consolidation phase.
However, I have a somewhat different view.
For balance purposes, I would like the police side of the propaganda tree to be used for converting provinces and alternatively for the research tree to be used in stable settlements after the ideology issues have been settled.
Even conceptually, the political opinions of the children don't really matter until more than 10+ years down the line which is practically outside of the boundaries of the game.
Though again, the trade-offs are what is most important to me.