安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
i realised when making engine systems, small hydro tanks are more versatile and act as armouring if hit from the side of the ship, and the ship still functions after being hit.
same concept with small batterys i was putting them as armouring layers internally they have there benefits;
they are a fuel source, that's spread out and harder to kill overall and protect other vital systems.
does it still function good with ions alone ?, if you get what i mean, like make the space performance better overall when regarding ion based performance minus the hydrogen, so you can still be a scary fighter in one field that being space over planets if hydrogen depletes breaking atmosphere or something :)
still a fast fighter overall would be more of an interceptor style build, it serves a purpose.
if you consider cost to effectiveness its OK, its fuel capacity makes it less likely to be deployed long distances for it will run out of fuel quite fast in a planetary scenario its hydrogen reliant, it might have enough fuel to break atmosphere, but will be quiet useless after the hydrogen is depleted.