安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I saw that you managed to get less game! Fantastic!
I was wondering if you know how to completely change the animals you catch.
Let me explain: I've tried changing the weight of the birds, for example, but these only change for animals that are found with the inspector mode.
Another factor that breaks the game a lot are the little birds that weigh 0.1kg and sometimes give even -40 hunger. you can pack 300 in a freezer
At high levels of cooking, and trap building, you catch huge beasts that we would feed on for weeks.
Do you think there is a way to tweak the protein level, fat and weight of the animals you catch?
In multiplayer no matter how much you lower the probability of catching something, the clock is ticking and in the long run the traps still catch them all!
I'm just looking for a way to actually use what you catch and not hoard endlessly
Thanks for the time!
@soalokin Maybe you lack the skill so they won't show on your list yet.
@pynoTTV Sorry was away for a while and then after coming back I didn't get the chance to answer and look into everything in steam. Im guessing you get a lot of animals when using certain types of baits , yes? I think it should be pretty easy to configure that... needs a lot of testing tho. I'll look into it. I'm working on a vanilla friendly hunting system as well now, as the one I was using way too simple and not dynamic enough. I want animals to be caught while ONLY being IN the forest + various gun sounds and so on and on, you gonna like it.
I found the "abundance" of game too high, it is really too easy to catch 100 rabbits or birds in the usual piece of woods. I would like to know according to your knowledge of the code if this can be corrected somehow.