安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






@malvern city: Please don't hesitate to post these kind of comments! I really appreciate it and I can definitely see what you mean. I've never really experimented with different illumination maps and played it kinda safe. So that's probably the reason why it looks generic especially on this building. You are absolutely right and I'll work on a new illumination map :)
I did have some hesitation in giving this feedback. Because I appreciate everything the creators do for this community. But because this is a skyscaper that will dominate a skyline and because this asset is advertised as "revisited" I felt it was important to provide the constructive criticism. Like I said in my previous comment the masonry texture improvements are outstanding but the illumination is what misses the mark.