安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Just out of curiosity, you seem to be somewhat of a Khorne expert...
Would you be able to help create a LITE version of Trajann's Khorne compilation, between a third and a fifth of the size? You could help picking the units that "make it" into LITE. Would this something that you're interested in? If yes, come here to this Discussion that we're currently using for another LITE mod and just write a comment, say hi :) We'll take things from there...
Trajanns mods have an insane amount of new units but they are almost all expensive top tier units.
The two new marauder variant offer anti large and armor piercing for a very good price. CW-GW is also still quite cheap and useful all the time. So in the end I as a player will use the mentioned three units maybe more than the 50++ Trajann units in most games (since most people stop playing at around long victory / around turn 150).
The greatweapon units do not have the hide in forest attribute (and not the I guess purely visual Mark of Khorne.)
I think all the great weapon units could need a little buff to be the clear choice against armored infantry compared to halberd units (for example +5 anti inf).
I find the cost of the units are way lower then the default units. Thus favoring the player to use these units heavily in the early game, when funds are sparse (maybe this is your objective? idk)
Enjoying the mod, great work, thank you.