Portal 2
Museum
9 条留言
ĐⱤ₳Ⱡ₳₥i₳₦  [作者] 2023 年 7 月 22 日 下午 4:21 
It's probably best if you move on
bullfrog 2023 年 7 月 22 日 上午 5:51 
Hmm, do I "have patience and a good reaction time"? Well, my "patience" is pretty good, I think, but my "reaction time" is pretty rubbish, as you know. Perhaps it's best if I just move on, unless you think otherwise?
Mr Fab 2022 年 10 月 30 日 上午 12:07 
It's pretty empty for a museum, there's no piece of art ! Except for the puzzle, it was pretty good :steamthumbsup:
quatrus 2022 年 9 月 1 日 上午 8:11 
No - sorry too troublesome for me - even with the walkthrough below.
ĐⱤ₳Ⱡ₳₥i₳₦  [作者] 2022 年 8 月 31 日 下午 8:57 
@nerdlingnation the portal angle at 1:12 is unintended which led you to skip a part and do the unintended fling at 1:30. But everything else is fine. Thanks, I was able to update the map.
jandlml 2022 年 8 月 31 日 下午 6:57 
definitely needed that walkthru , thanks nerdlington. not my strong suit
nerdlingnation 2022 年 8 月 30 日 下午 10:31 
Here is a video of what I did: https://youtu.be/7vcgQ2F-Sn4
I think that what I did at about 1:30 was unintended. It didn't feel too out of place based on your good reaction time remark in the description, and I know that some of your other maps have included some tighter portal shot angles. I assume that the intended way used some other way to give the cube momentum at first which involved the 2 unused surfaces in my video. Anyway, it should be an easy fix if you want to patch that one out. Good map.
ĐⱤ₳Ⱡ₳₥i₳₦  [作者] 2022 年 8 月 30 日 下午 7:48 
@nerdlingnation I give up, how did you get the cube redirecting the laser to the light bridge catcher for the first time? The only thing I can think of is you either threw a cube upwards or you jumped off the cube, grabbed it, then raised it above your head to drop it.
nerdlingnation 2022 年 8 月 30 日 下午 3:55 
Solved this one a bit ago but didn't leave a comment. Very cool puzzle. I have a hard time with momentum sometimes. At least, building puzzles that use momentum. I didn't use the laserfielded surface on the ceiling; not sure what that's for. My solution felt completely logical, though.