安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






100/10
! Thanks!
why don't you set more respawn point
As for the rest, I'm assuming it's a work in progress. In it's current state it holds nothing for me to want to play it repeatedly. 100% understand wanting to avoid the "run and cap flags frenzy" that plagues some maps but this minimalist setup just seems excessive for this size of map.
I wanna see more of these on ravenfield
2. I had vehicles initially, which is why nothing has coliders. but im adding vehicles, thus itl remain that way.
3. its open on purpose, that way you focus on the combat at long range etc without huge repetative cqc objectives.