安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






However, yesterday I pushed an update with 20 m/s² hover engines, so atmospheric flight is now possible up to 2 g.
I can increase the warp exponent to 12 as well, so at 10 km/s (which is the physical velocity during the Warp To command) you'd go about a light year per second, that should work better for the actual warping part at least.
I've also just had a look at the Corvette's boost acceleration and it seems to be about 80 m/s². I might go for that instead or a value inside that range, maybe 50 or 60 m/s². That would push the warp acceleration time down to about two minutes when starting at 0, which is reasonable, imo.
20 m/s² forward thrust seems reasonable to me so far, since that seems to be about the acceleration in E:D and it's not too too high considering inertial dampeners don't seem to exist in E:D.
For hovering, I'm thinking about maneuvering thrusters kept at about 5 m/s² (maybe 10), but additional hover engines with 10 to 20 m/s² and their effects coming out of the existing maneuvering thruster ports.