安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Dont you think there is a better leader to choose for Ukraine than Zelenskyy? Such as Pavlo Skoropadskyi?
-Arlin-
I have to imagine Ukraine would be a fairly heavy defensive Civilization. Based around careful management of favored terrains such as hills or bonuses along mountainsides.
Going off of a leader ability, I would think something giving a bonus towards Amenities would actually make sense, and bonuses towards combat strength when fighting on home territory as well.
I don't want to go too far with suggestions since I don't want to feel like I'm just babbling or bothering you. Those were just my immediate thoughts.
Ukraine and Ruthenia were planned as separate civilizations. I only have Ruthenia's abilities listed out though, what would you have me do for Ukraine?
Best Regards,
Strudeler Tarts
I would probably use a modified version of the seal of Polotsk if I were to change the icon, but overall I do not think it is a very big issue. I understand you meant no harm in making it the Pahonia.
Montenegro would be something new for civ 6, as there are already mods representing muscovy, however, I think a standalone Muscovy civ would be more successful and will have an interesting playstyle.
I chose the main icon to differentiate from another, modern Belarus mod. I did not intend anything perverse with the pahonia, it seemed to me that Lithuania and Belarus held a certain kinship. If you were to change it, what symbol would you use?
Oh, what sounds better in the near future: Montenegro or Muscovy?
Best Regards,
Strudeler
overall i think it represents belarus quite well, only criticism i have is the polish-lithuanian commonwealth references in its icons despite it representing independent polotsk rather than lithuanian belarus