安装 Steam						
					
				
				
									登录
											 | 
						语言
						
																																															繁體中文(繁体中文)
																													日本語(日语)
																													한국어(韩语)
																													ไทย(泰语)
																													български(保加利亚语)
																													Čeština(捷克语)
																													Dansk(丹麦语)
																													Deutsch(德语)
																													English(英语)
																													Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
																													Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
																													Ελληνικά(希腊语)
																													Français(法语)
																													Italiano(意大利语)
																													Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
																													Magyar(匈牙利语)
																													Nederlands(荷兰语)
																													Norsk(挪威语)
																													Polski(波兰语)
																													Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
																													Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
																													Română(罗马尼亚语)
																													Русский(俄语)
																													Suomi(芬兰语)
																													Svenska(瑞典语)
																													Türkçe(土耳其语)
																													Tiếng Việt(越南语)
																													Українська(乌克兰语)
																									报告翻译问题
							
						
 
											 
													







@jvawter: In the projectile tab there's a checkbox for "can pierce fort walls." Sorry it took me until the end of November to answer your question.
Plate mail being a word that pretty much anyone with a basic background knowledge of historical arms and armour would know is a No-No term to use to describe Plate harness.
Here is what Humprey Barwick has to say of Muskets.
But to the musket againe: The musketes are weapons of great force, and at this day, bothe with leaders and followers, much feared: for fewe or no Armours, will or can defend the force thereof, being néerehand, which is as well a terror to the best armed, as to the meanest: it will kill the armed of proofe at ten skore yardes, the common armours at twenty score, and the vnarmed at thirty skore, being well vsed in bullet and tried powder.
Now as to whether a Japanese arquebus that is likely firing a 2-3 monme or so projectile is capable of penetration through large wooden structures and causing 'Splintering' to the level to cause injuries... Is up to personal opinion... But I highly doubt that would be the case in actuality, at least with 'splintering' and 'casualties', penetration through wood is a different matter.
Funnily enough, despite what people commonly think, Muskets, with period charges usually giving muzzle velocities reaching or exceeding 400 m/s, with 500 m/s also possible especially if you are double-charging your shot, as gunners were advised to do if facing against armoured opponents. Arquebusses, calivers etcetera, though firing significantly lighter shot than that used by Muskets or Demi-muskets, still had a fairly high muzzle velocity.
Curiously, the muzzle velocity of 19th century firearms dropped quite significantly, even in military cartridges, which hovered around the 300+ m/s mark. This is probably due to a combination of the fact that armour was virtually gone and that when hypersonic missiles hit subsonic during their flight path will suddenly encounter stability issues... which happens even in rifled and pointed projectiles... is probably what prompted the change.
Rifles in FOTS fire bullets which beside the shape have a much higher velocity than matchlock guns, therefore have better penetrating power.
because it would not make sense for a bullet to pierce rock walls in those situations.
They've changed just about all the effective ranges though. I guess I could throw together a version compatible with Radious real quick, it's not super difficult.