安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
thanks to @Gregarius for the suggestion!
I had a few hundred items get added after joining a game with Hyper Research and the person had already learned all the things using wood, stone, boreal wood, etc. It was pretty glorious, and only showed up on my screen for a few seconds since it was a chat message. I hit my enter key to open chat and go back to it and check if anything I wanted was there. Pretty useful.
And I checked again regarding "partial research"; this is not the case in regular gameplay, you only store "fully researched items" in the book. The reason modded items get a special handle is because a modder might lower the amount required to research the item in an update, and if you had the mod disabled at some point, this value will carry over and when you use the item again, it will grant you the research if possible
Also I noticed another comment about packet size restricting what is possible, could that be a problem if you have a ton of (modded) items researched? Does it fail gracefully (i.e. no crash) if I would reach that limit?
Thanks for your quick replies!
How about a different item for any one single item's research, would have to be somehow picked in game though. (Am I making sense? For example wanting to share research of just black pearls, so would need a menu to pick them to make the item to share just those.)
It would be convenient if it did include part research, though. Imagine 2 friends both half researching some rare material, or even one of them accidentally researching the last 5 needed items of this resource, while the other could have completed it. Awkward!
Would be nice if they could combine that. :)
Digi62, why not just manually turn it off? (Or disable it from server side.)