安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
(heh quadrant is 4 for quadttuor is four in latin. Sudoku is 9 segments with novem being nine in latin)
One method is outward in. Where one is takes a randomly generated Sudoku puzzle (or one you made by hand) and try to pattern match by hand where the additional rules go. Then you remove all the numbers and measure what is the bare minimum one needs to know to proceed to the next sections.
Another is inward out, where one just deferentially makes up a puzzle as they go along and are keen to not break any assertions along the way.
Puzzle making definitely is an interesting craft, and sometimes machine generated puzzles just can't compare to some clever rules people come up with. Sometimes just messing around with it and testing it thoroughly is a good way to go.
It turns out to be a really interesting and non-trivial problem to create good Sudoku puzzles.
https://www.sudokuwiki.org/Sudoku_Creation_and_Grading.pdf
https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/56149/how-can-i-generate-sudoku-puzzles
It seems a bit more difficult than just generating a sudoku puzzle as you have to ensure it is sufficiently solvable as the clues are unfolding.
otherwise very fun tho, was fun.
9/10 was fun
Cant wait for the next one ;)