安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






general answer: complicated/non-cohesive planning in the early development of the mod
Dunno how the ui would look but should be alright
Just wanted to thank Modder for this one and bring up a little issue me and my friends have encounter when playing yesterday.
Apparently, the bonus of 20% base dev cost reduction in Centralism Idea doesn't apply even when all conditions are reunited (All provinces at 25 dev).
Is it a problem from the mod or just à miscalculation on my part ?
Thanks again (and sorry for my lame way of writing, I'm french you know) !
Yeah feel free to use it and I assume the bare minimum would be to ensure there are no same id's, so if you also have exploration_ideas, pick one of them type deal.
Great mod, thanks in advance!
Regarding Beyond Cape unlikely although I haven't checked where the conflict occurs. In case I don't do anything with that I would not be opposed to someone doing it either.
Follow up question, are there any plans to potentially make a version of this compatible with Beyond the Cape, and if not, would you be opposed to someone doing that on their own?
On the otherhand I would recommend my Doge Shattered Europa mod (there is a vanilla bookmark) which has a bunch of content for plenty of time. :)
Also added lollard, waldensian, druze, nestorian idea groups in case the mod you use has them.