安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






It's just a mechanic that work well both thematically and game design-wise
It's similar to how Dwarven "kat'usha' works in AoW Planetfall. Except it can move but loses +2 Range buff and must spend whole turn to get it again.
But I don't like the changes on builder and battering ram.
The builder is already a very powerfull unit when you know how to use it (setup forts for structures and future colonies, watchtower for vision, roads to ease the supply line). I can agree for the maintenance skill, but not for giving it a combat role as it's vulnerability is the treadoff of such a unit.
The battery ram is a proper T2 unit made for siege. It has a powerfull 1 hit attack that you can't retaliate against (though it can't retaliate), and it has a lot of HP and bonus against ranged attacks. Offensivelly, it is a very hard to kill unit that can serve as cover for your melee unit, and in defense it is a great unit to place where your gate was after it got destroyed.
Trebuchet is not popular among me just because it's machine and there's no effective way to repair it while in the wilds (Dread hero with repair machine but will you have them or not). As defense unit it's good enough.