武装突袭3

武装突袭3

Cobra : First Strike : A Single-Player Scenar
42 条留言
marco.toppy 9 月 14 日 上午 9:05 
Thanks in advance for your job. :steamsalty:
Killertrifle  [作者] 9 月 14 日 上午 3:51 
Hi bud, yeah I think something has updated regarding the AI and has broken it, I will look into a fix.
marco.toppy 9 月 7 日 下午 1:15 
not found addon fx and at start mission the helicopter get a loop and the mission deasnt avance... :steamsad:
Komodo 2024 年 10 月 25 日 下午 5:44 
dude this was an absolute blast to play

ty
Killertrifle  [作者] 2024 年 7 月 26 日 上午 1:39 
Ah sorry, they are still being made, I have no idea when they will be finished but ideally not much longer.
Liberty_Valance 2024 年 7 月 24 日 下午 2:26 
ok; what are these new scenarios plz
Killertrifle  [作者] 2024 年 7 月 24 日 下午 12:26 
I believe the cause of this is, the Aegis and Theseus addons require either the Sahara DLC or the compatibility patch found on the workshop. I have moved away from these mods in my new scenarios to avoid this issue.
Liberty_Valance 2024 年 7 月 24 日 下午 12:17 
same as SERPENT scenario... some addond is missing
Killertrifle  [作者] 2024 年 7 月 22 日 上午 7:00 
Thank You! :steamthumbsup:
Avant-garde 2024 年 7 月 21 日 上午 8:36 
Awesome! Well-placed enemies, cool camera & events!
Liberty_Valance 2023 年 10 月 22 日 下午 1:50 
ok, thanks
Killertrifle  [作者] 2023 年 10 月 22 日 下午 1:47 
uhhhh not far at all. Got a lot of IRL commitments atm and only time I have been on has been spent on other games. I will look into it but cannot guarantee anytime soon.
Liberty_Valance 2023 年 10 月 20 日 上午 9:19 
where are you on this problem ?
Killertrifle  [作者] 2023 年 10 月 18 日 上午 6:26 
Thank you bud, very annoying but I will have a look soon.
Liberty_Valance 2023 年 10 月 13 日 下午 12:59 
same problem as SERPENT
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 22 日 上午 2:49 
Thank you! Yeah, I had to find a more natural and enjoyable way to extend mission time. I'm glad you enjoyed it! :steamthumbsup:
kalman 2021 年 10 月 21 日 上午 4:37 
Great Mission! Was really surprised when suddenly the ground attack on the remaining survivors came!
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 18 日 上午 12:58 
Okay thank you.:steamthumbsup:
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 11:56 
I'm glad to bring improvement. You can make it more exquisite. The appearance cost of these equipment is not high
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 7:22 
That CSAT uniform does look really nice to be fair. May incorporate it in future scenarios. :steamthumbsup:
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 6:26 
You can use an ordinary black backpack with a bulletproof plug-in vest, which is very exquisite after matching with sand color and city camouflage, while CTRG can use apexdlc sight with 6.5mm gun family,You can also configure a black night vision system as standard to make them look better, or use CTRG 2035 series mod,Here are some screenshots: https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2084808210 https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2514852015
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 4:26 
Wait, do you think this is a mod that adds assets into the game? This is a scenario, a mission. I haven't made any of the assets used.
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 3:59 
Moreover, the design is not very reasonable, and there are problems with the model
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 3:56 
So this is just an issue of personal preference? I thought it was an actual issue.
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 3:55 
But it looks very ugly
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 17 日 上午 2:30 
Because CSAT is not just the Chinese? CSAT is a coalition, they are a direct counterpart to NATO, they are made up of multiple Eastern countries and get their weapons, armour, supplies etc from said countries. Also I've looked and no-where in the lore does it mention who specifically manufacturers what, aside from saying that Russia and China were the main suppliers. And even then, it does not really matter, its a CSAT backpack, thats all I needed, I didn't care who made it.
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 16 日 下午 11:40 
So why do Chinese speaking Asians use Japanese backpacks?
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 16 日 上午 10:08 
I am using base assets, it is a CSAT backpack for a faction supplied by CSAT. It fits completely fine in the 2037 setting, it makes sense for the faction to use. I honestly do not understand the problem.
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 16 日 上午 9:49 
It's not the core mechanism, it's the style. You should get something in line with the times, just the appearance. The backpack is designed by the Japanese and looks very ugly
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 16 日 上午 9:38 
There is a reason behind all of it, there are not mercenaries. What do you mean the backpack is annoying? Also I am using assets from the base game and mods which also use the base game assets, meaning that it will always be nondescript. Lack of features? what do you mean by this, I cannot change core gameplay mechanics.
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 16 日 上午 7:27 
You can find some materials for the image of mercenaries. Don't make it feel so nondescript
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 16 日 上午 7:26 
But the style is still lack of features. And the backpack of CSAT is very annoying. The most important thing is that those Asians speak Chinese rather than other languages. You can even set it as the background of military exercises
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 16 日 上午 1:04 
That's the thing, CTRG doesn't exist anymore, this is set in 2037. CSAT does exist but these guys aren't them. The TFS gear is appropriate as they have had major budget cuts, lack of supplies etc. They are supplied by NATO, the US, UK etc. Whereas Cobra, as of right now do not have an affiliation, they just use CSAT gear as it is presumed that they are supplied by CSAT. This scenario isn't about a main-line war. The main fighting is on the mainland but that is between the NAAF and terrorists. The TFS are relatively new and need to prove they are capable enough to warrant such supplies and big enough budgets. This timeline diverges from the Eastwind campaign, its not lore.
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 15 日 下午 10:47 
You need to find out the background of this war, don't be partial to one side, and the equipment of CTRG is too crude, while the equipment of CSAT is too chaotic, and why don't there be conventional troops?
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 15 日 上午 9:25 
I think I'm getting what you're saying but just in-case could you clarify?
Jian7ye 2021 年 10 月 13 日 上午 1:37 
I think you can refine the equipment of both sides and dilute the subjective image of both sides,I hope I can help you improve some combinations:CSAT::NATO:
txmshibxje 2021 年 10 月 4 日 下午 12:28 
No biggie ^^
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 4 日 下午 12:28 
cant seem to change it right now, so yeah, guess it stays as persistent
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 4 日 下午 12:27 
huh, weird, i dont know why it is tagged as it, might have added it for whatever reason but cannot think why I would, I'll fix it in a sec
txmshibxje 2021 年 10 月 4 日 下午 12:22 
That's... not really what persistent means. Just saying, its pretty confusing
Killertrifle  [作者] 2021 年 10 月 4 日 上午 6:43 
Thank you!! I honestly enjoyed this one, would've liked to have made it differently but when it comes to these single area CQC scenarios, Arma is very limiting. But I'm glad you enjoyed it! :steamthumbsup:
NiKo 2021 年 10 月 3 日 上午 11:22 
this was fucking awesome i loved every second of it good job