安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Feels like the weapon changes should be a separate mod, not mixed into Sashimonos.
347 new sashimono designs have been added 41 new noboris designs, and 4 new models have been added to the sashimonos.
Thanks for the reply! But what I mean is: The Yari cavalry, Light cavalry, Katana cavalry and Bow cavalry in all factions except Takeda don't have any Sachimonos. Is there a fix for this or does the mod just need an update or something?
Only special units have sashimonos unique to their factions, such as samurai with shimazu katana, cavalry with tokugawua blunderbuss, samurai with nodachi date, etc.
Mercenary, Guard, Monk, Ikko Ikki, and Hero units have their own sashimonos.
I haven't updated yet, I have a lot to do outside of modding.
I did not know that it modifies the armor. I'll check it tonight, I may have accidentally modified some file.
Hello, I was working on making all my mods compatible with MOSS, but I ran out of funds, so I paused that project until I could finance myself again to continue working on compatibility since due to the number of units it has it is something quite time consuming.
Yes
Firstly, I would like the units to have more sashimono flags with the emblem of their faction. Secondly, the large flags, the nobori, are mirrored when you are viewed from the front of the unit. And finally, all cavalry units don't have sashimonos, except special units of the faction (Tokugawa Mounted Gunners, Great Guard etc.), Takeda's cavalry and the general's units. (sorry for my bad english, if you are didn't understand something)
Cheers
I check it and fix it.
Is this an intended change?