安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
That would defacto exlude any newborn (since they start at 0), but still allow for visiting children to have them
Pretty sure it's not intended behavior.
Probably because it's considered "pawn generation" by this mod and applies apropriate percentage chance of occuring.
Could it be possible to exclude newborns from being born with them?
It's all on XML's end at the moment, so if someone like me was stumped at what was causing the problem and had no idea, check if you have XML Extensions.
Awesome mods though, love every Eccentric mod!
I think I have found an incompatibility with Nals Facial Animations mod, either with WIP or the Experimental.
I first began to investigate when on of the ears was floating high above the pawns head, and after some fiddling around, I removed NFA but nothing fixed it. So, I decided to place NFA above ET, and now the ears and tails don't display at all. The animations, however, are working perfectly again for NFA (I kept them for the eyes redraw), which hadn't been for months. So, somewhere (I'm no expert) I believe there is a core compatibility problem between these two mods.
I can reproduce this consistently, and I have hugslib, so I can share a log if you like (if I can remember how to. Lol)
Not sure what's going on, but I love both mods. I would hate to have to give up NFA, but if needs must, well...
I want the better looking bunny ears..